StockData

Amer Sports vs Under Armour

AS and UAA side by side, both in apparel and other finished products made from fabrics and similar materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How AS and UAA compare

Amer Sports grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (30.5% versus −3.6% for Under Armour).

Amer Sports keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.3% compared with −10.0% at Under Armour.

Amer Sports scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 2 for Under Armour), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricASUAA
Size and price
Market cap–$2.1B
Share price$29.43$4.99
Change, 1 year−8.4%8.0%
Change, 5 years–−80.1%
Beta (5Y)1.151.29
Employees3,00014K
StockData Score
Total score10 (better)2
Valuation score01 (better)
Growth score4 (better)0
Performance score4 (better)0
Health score2 (better)1
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–0.4×
P/B–1.5×
FCF yield–−3.8%
Fair value–$5.67
Margin of safety–12.0%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)30.5% (better)−3.6%
Revenue growth, 5Y average–−1.2%
Net income growth (TTM)144% (better)−585%
EPS growth (TTM)132% (better)−623%
Profitability
Gross margin59.8% (better)46.8%
Operating margin12.9% (better)−2.4%
Net margin7.3% (better)−10.0%
FCF margin9.3% (better)−1.6%
Return on equity8.8% (better)−29.8%
Return on invested capital11.9% (better)−5.3%
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.41
Interest coverage6.2× (better)−1.9×
Current ratio1.761.81 (better)
Altman Z-score–1.97
Piotroski F-score7 (better)4
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield–0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions37.9%92.2%
Held by insiders69.7%39.4%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$33.3M$225M (better)
Superinvestors holding11
Short interest, % of float8.1%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.