Arts Way Manufacturing vs Lindsay
ARTW and LNN side by side, both in industrial and commercial machinery and computer equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ARTW and LNN compare
Lindsay is the larger company, worth 75 times as much as Arts Way Manufacturing ($1.1B against $14.5M).
Arts Way Manufacturing grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (4.5% versus −6.0% for Lindsay).
Lindsay keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 8.8% compared with −1.6% at Arts Way Manufacturing.
Lindsay pays a dividend yielding 1.4%; Arts Way Manufacturing does not pay one.
Lindsay scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 6 for Arts Way Manufacturing), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ARTW | LNN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $14.5M | $1.1B |
| Share price | $2.78 | $107.25 |
| Change, 1 year | 12.9% | −4.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −24.9% | −32.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.53 | 0.66 |
| Employees | 66 | 1,083 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 17 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 20.1× |
| P/S | 0.6× (better) | 1.7× |
| P/B | 1.1× (better) | 2.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | 21.0× | 11.3× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 31.4× |
| FCF yield | −7.2% | 3.2% (better) |
| Fair value | $2.21 | $125.62 |
| Margin of safety | −25.9% | 14.6% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 4.5% (better) | −6.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 0.50% | 2.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −117% | −24.8% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −118% | −21.4% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 6.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 26.0% | 28.9% (better) |
| Operating margin | −0.09% | 10.5% (better) |
| Net margin | −1.6% | 8.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | −4.1% | 5.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | −3.0% | 10.7% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −0.11% | 11.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.17 (better) | 0.23 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.94 (better) | −0.83 |
| Interest coverage | −0.0× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.71 | 3.15 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.44 | 4.99 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.4% |
| Payout ratio | – | 27.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 16 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 2.8% |
| Buyback yield | 0.01% | 7.4% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.01% | 8.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 7.2% | 103% |
| Held by insiders | 51.8% | 1.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$49.4K |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.86% | 9.2% |
Go deeper
- ARTW stock overview
- ARTW income statement
- ARTW valuation and score
- LNN stock overview
- LNN income statement
- LNN valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.