Artesian Resources vs Cadiz
ARTNA and CDZI side by side, both in water supply. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ARTNA and CDZI compare
Artesian Resources is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Cadiz ($342M against $282M).
Artesian Resources grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.9% versus −21.3% for Cadiz).
Artesian Resources keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 20.2% compared with −311% at Cadiz.
Artesian Resources pays a dividend yielding 3.8%; Cadiz does not pay one.
Artesian Resources scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 3 for Cadiz), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ARTNA | CDZI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $342M | $282M |
| Share price | $33.09 | $3.38 |
| Change, 1 year | 2.0% | −30.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −25.4% | −32.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.27 | 1.26 |
| Employees | 274 | 31 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 14.4× | – |
| P/S | 2.9× (better) | 23.8× |
| P/B | 1.3× (better) | 60.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.9× | – |
| PEG | 2.80 | – |
| FCF yield | −5.3% (better) | −11.1% |
| Fair value | $45.48 | – |
| Margin of safety | 27.2% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.9% (better) | −21.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.1% | 97.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 5.5% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 5.5% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 4.3% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 27.1% |
| Operating margin | 25.0% (better) | −236% |
| Net margin | 20.2% (better) | −311% |
| FCF margin | −15.5% (better) | −264% |
| Return on equity | 9.4% (better) | −183% |
| Return on invested capital | 5.4% (better) | −26.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.71 (better) | 18.65 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.99 | – |
| Interest coverage | 3.3× (better) | −2.8× |
| Current ratio | 1.01 | 1.16 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.73 (better) | −6.68 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.8% | – |
| Payout ratio | 54.8% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 16 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 4.0% | – |
| Buyback yield | −0.10% | 0.00% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 3.7% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 51.6% | 47.1% |
| Held by insiders | 1.7% | 3.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.0M | $497K (better) |
Go deeper
- ARTNA stock overview
- ARTNA income statement
- ARTNA valuation and score
- CDZI stock overview
- CDZI income statement
- CDZI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.