StockData

Arm vs Globalfoundries

ARM and GFS side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ARM and GFS compare

Arm grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (25.1% versus 1.4% for Globalfoundries).

Arm keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 20.2% compared with 10.3% at Globalfoundries.

Arm scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 8 for Globalfoundries), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricARMGFS
Size and price
Share price$205.97$41.90
Change, 1 year20.9%22.0%
Change, 5 years–−34.2%
Beta (5Y)2.881.79
Employees9,5841,600
StockData Score
Total score13 (better)8
Valuation score00
Growth score4 (better)1
Performance score4 (better)3
Health score5 (better)4
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)25.1% (better)1.4%
Revenue growth, 5Y average–7.0%
Net income growth (TTM)49.4%–
EPS growth (TTM)47.0%–
Profitability
Gross margin97.5% (better)27.1%
Operating margin17.0% (better)11.6%
Net margin20.2% (better)10.3%
FCF margin29.2% (better)11.5%
Return on equity13.4% (better)6.2%
Return on invested capital16.4% (better)5.8%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.09 (better)
Net debt / EBITDA–0.04
Current ratio5.25 (better)2.48
Piotroski F-score78 (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions9.3%98.2%
Held by insiders86.8%72.0%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$72.2M−$3.8M (better)
Superinvestors holding2–
Short interest, % of float–4.5%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.