StockData

Arm vs Cirrus Logic

ARM and CRUS side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ARM and CRUS compare

Arm grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (25.1% versus 6.2% for Cirrus Logic).

Cirrus Logic keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 21.0% compared with 20.2% at Arm.

Cirrus Logic scores higher on the StockData Score (20 against 13 for Arm), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricARMCRUS
Size and price
Market cap–$5.5B
Share price$205.97$109.82
Change, 1 year20.9%−16.4%
Change, 5 years–39.3%
Beta (5Y)2.881.12
Employees9,5841,668
StockData Score
Total score1320 (better)
Valuation score06 (better)
Growth score4 (better)2
Performance score46 (better)
Health score56 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E–13.4×
P/S–2.7×
P/B–2.5×
EV/EBITDA–8.9×
P/FCF–9.6×
PEG–0.37
FCF yield–10.4%
Fair value–$185.74
Margin of safety–40.9%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)25.1% (better)6.2%
Revenue growth, 5Y average–7.8%
Net income growth (TTM)49.4% (better)23.0%
EPS growth (TTM)47.0% (better)28.0%
EPS growth, 5Y average–16.7%
Profitability
Gross margin97.5% (better)52.8%
Operating margin17.0%23.0% (better)
Net margin20.2%21.0% (better)
FCF margin29.2% (better)27.9%
Return on equity13.4%20.9% (better)
Return on invested capital16.4%28.9% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.00
Interest coverage–471×
Current ratio5.257.58 (better)
Altman Z-score–11.03
Piotroski F-score79 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield–3.8%
Shareholder yield–3.8%
Ownership
Held by institutions9.3%106%
Held by insiders86.8%0.64%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$72.2M−$13.5M (better)
Superinvestors holding2–
Short interest, % of float–7.0%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.