Alliance Resource Partners LP vs NACCO Industries
ARLP and NC side by side, both in energy. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ARLP and NC compare
Alliance Resource Partners LP is the larger company, worth 12 times as much as NACCO Industries ($3.2B against $266M).
NACCO Industries grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (0.54% versus −10.4% for Alliance Resource Partners LP).
Alliance Resource Partners LP keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 14.2% compared with 5.3% at NACCO Industries.
Both pay dividends: Alliance Resource Partners LP yields 9.5% and NACCO Industries 2.9%.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ARLP | NC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.2B | $266M |
| Share price | $25.25 | $35.23 |
| Change, 1 year | 3.7% | −22.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 147% | 15.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.23 | 0.61 |
| Employees | 2,013 | 1,700 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 | 10 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 17.9× |
| P/S | 1.5× | 0.9× (better) |
| P/B | – | 0.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.6× | 4.4× (better) |
| P/FCF | 8.4× | – |
| FCF yield | 11.9% | – |
| Fair value | $41.64 | $33.85 |
| Margin of safety | 39.4% (better) | −4.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −10.4% | 0.54% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.6% | 16.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −13.8% (better) | −48.4% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −49.4% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 2.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 18.9% |
| Operating margin | 17.6% (better) | 9.1% |
| Net margin | 14.2% (better) | 5.3% |
| FCF margin | 17.7% | – |
| Return on equity | – | 3.4% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 5.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.02 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.85 (better) | −0.97 |
| Interest coverage | 9.7× (better) | 4.0× |
| Current ratio | 1.37 | 3.16 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.61 (better) | 2.20 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 9.5% (better) | 2.9% |
| Payout ratio | – | 51.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 7 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 5.1% |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | 0.69% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 9.5% (better) | 3.6% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 15.3% | 28.2% |
| Held by insiders | 16.9% | 31.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $80.2K (better) | −$383K |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.6% | 1.7% |
Go deeper
- ARLP stock overview
- ARLP income statement
- ARLP valuation and score
- NC stock overview
- NC income statement
- NC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.