ARK Restaurants vs Flanigans Enterprises
ARKR and BDL side by side, both in eating and drinking places. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ARKR and BDL compare
Flanigans Enterprises is the larger company, worth 6.5 times as much as ARK Restaurants ($105M against $16.3M).
Flanigans Enterprises grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (7.1% versus −9.5% for ARK Restaurants).
Flanigans Enterprises keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.1% compared with −2.0% at ARK Restaurants.
Flanigans Enterprises pays a dividend yielding 1.1%; ARK Restaurants does not pay one.
Flanigans Enterprises scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 5 for ARK Restaurants), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ARKR | BDL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $16.3M | $105M |
| Share price | $4.51 | $56.49 |
| Change, 1 year | −37.4% | 79.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −73.8% | 65.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.53 | 0.27 |
| Employees | 1,566 | 2,033 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 3 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 15.8× |
| P/S | 0.1× (better) | 0.5× |
| P/B | 0.5× (better) | 1.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 7.5× |
| P/FCF | – | 22.7× |
| FCF yield | −38.9% | 4.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $14.15 | $69.27 |
| Margin of safety | 68.1% (better) | 18.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −9.5% | 7.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.3% | 12.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 53.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 53.2% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 35.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | −1.6% | 5.3% (better) |
| Net margin | −2.0% | 3.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | −4.1% | 2.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | −9.6% | 9.9% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −7.2% | 15.2% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.21 (better) | 0.45 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 0.16 |
| Interest coverage | −6.7× | 10.3× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.78 | 2.04 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.39 | 3.24 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.1% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 1.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 19.0% | 10.4% |
| Held by insiders | 68.3% | 70.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$808K | $119K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.67% | 2.5% |
Go deeper
- ARKR stock overview
- ARKR income statement
- ARKR valuation and score
- BDL stock overview
- BDL income statement
- BDL valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.