StockData

Ares Management vs Brookfield Asset Management

ARES and BAM side by side, both in services allied with the exchange of securities. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ARES and BAM compare

Brookfield Asset Management grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (31.9% versus 28.5% for Ares Management).

Brookfield Asset Management keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 53.4% compared with 12.0% at Ares Management.

Ares Management pays a dividend yielding 4.0%; Brookfield Asset Management does not pay one.

Ares Management scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 7 for Brookfield Asset Management), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricARESBAM
Size and price
Market cap$46.2B–
Share price$128.15$48.26
Change, 1 year−14.9%−11.5%
Change, 5 years49.6%−21.6%
Beta (5Y)1.631.30
Employees4,250150
StockData Score
Total score13 (better)7
Valuation score00
Growth score3 (better)1
Performance score22
Health score44
Dividend score4 (better)0
Valuation
P/S8.7×–
P/B11.6×–
Fair value$65.67–
Margin of safety−95.1%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)28.5%31.9% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average22.1%–
Net income growth (TTM)32.6%32.8% (better)
Profitability
Net margin12.0%53.4% (better)
Return on equity15.3%36.2% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00–
Altman Z-score1.41–
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield4.0%–
Payout ratio14.6%98.5%
Shareholder yield4.0%–
Ownership
Held by institutions61.0%93.3%
Held by insiders61.8%76.6%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$90.2M–
Superinvestors holding11
Short interest, % of float11.3%5.3%

Go deeper

Other comparisons

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.