StockData

Apyx Medical vs TELA Bio

APYX and TELA side by side, both in surgical, medical, and dental instruments and supplies. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How APYX and TELA compare

Apyx Medical is the larger company, worth 3.0 times as much as TELA Bio ($126M against $42.3M).

Apyx Medical grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (24.4% versus 1.5% for TELA Bio).

Apyx Medical keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −14.2% compared with −53.6% at TELA Bio.

Apyx Medical scores higher on the StockData Score (4 against 3 for TELA Bio), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricAPYXTELA
Size and price
Market cap$126M$42.3M
Share price$3.00$0.942
Change, 1 year−26.8%−20.9%
Change, 5 years−82.1%−92.5%
Beta (5Y)1.490.64
Employees205218
StockData Score
Total score4 (better)3
Valuation score01 (better)
Growth score2 (better)1
Performance score11
Health score1 (better)0
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S2.1×0.5× (better)
P/B13.1×–
FCF yield−7.0% (better)−81.3%
Fair value$2.23–
Margin of safety−34.6%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)24.4% (better)1.5%
Revenue growth, 5Y average13.8%34.5% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin63.4%67.2% (better)
Operating margin−5.5% (better)−43.2%
Net margin−14.2% (better)−53.6%
FCF margin−14.9% (better)−44.0%
Return on equity−109%–
Return on invested capital−14.9% (better)−238%
Financial health
Debt / equity3.69–
Interest coverage−0.6× (better)−4.3×
Current ratio4.95 (better)0.61
Altman Z-score0.91 (better)−13.19
Piotroski F-score5 (better)3
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions58.5%70.5%
Held by insiders6.8%41.0%
Insider net buying, 12 months–$186K
Short interest, % of float0.62%2.2%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.