Asia Pacific Wire & Cable vs Quanex Building Products
APWC and NX side by side, both in rolling, drawing, and extruding of nonferrous. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How APWC and NX compare
Asia Pacific Wire & Cable grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (3.6% versus 1.3% for Quanex Building Products).
Quanex Building Products keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.4% compared with 0.75% at Asia Pacific Wire & Cable.
Quanex Building Products pays a dividend yielding 1.7%; Asia Pacific Wire & Cable does not pay one.
Quanex Building Products scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 3 for Asia Pacific Wire & Cable), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | APWC | NX |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $879M |
| Share price | $1.11 | $19.19 |
| Change, 1 year | −40.0% | 45.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −60.6% | −16.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.46 | 1.09 |
| Employees | 1,216 | 7,071 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 19.4× |
| P/S | – | 0.5× |
| P/B | – | 1.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 7.1× |
| P/FCF | – | 9.7× |
| FCF yield | – | 10.3% |
| Fair value | – | $21.55 |
| Margin of safety | – | 11.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.6% (better) | 1.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.3% | 16.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 5.3% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 5.9% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 7.0% | 26.6% (better) |
| Operating margin | 1.3% | 6.0% (better) |
| Net margin | 0.75% | 2.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | −2.3% | 4.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | 2.3% | 6.2% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 3.0% | 6.5% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.25 (better) | 0.89 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.69 (better) | 2.87 |
| Interest coverage | 3.3× (better) | 2.2× |
| Current ratio | 2.34 (better) | 2.23 |
| Altman Z-score | – | 1.89 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.7% |
| Payout ratio | 8.3% | 32.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 0.00% |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.55% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 2.2% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 1.3% | 102% |
| Held by insiders | – | 10.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$3.4M |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 7.1% |
Go deeper
- APWC stock overview
- APWC income statement
- APWC valuation and score
- NX stock overview
- NX income statement
- NX valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.