Asia Pacific Wire & Cable vs Mueller Industries
APWC and MLI side by side, both in rolling, drawing, and extruding of nonferrous. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How APWC and MLI compare
Mueller Industries grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.8% versus 3.6% for Asia Pacific Wire & Cable).
Mueller Industries keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 17.3% compared with 0.75% at Asia Pacific Wire & Cable.
Mueller Industries pays a dividend yielding 1.2%; Asia Pacific Wire & Cable does not pay one.
Mueller Industries scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 3 for Asia Pacific Wire & Cable), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | APWC | MLI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $12.0B |
| Share price | $1.11 | $54.89 |
| Change, 1 year | −40.0% | 0.60% |
| Change, 5 years | −60.6% | 265% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.46 | 0.90 |
| Employees | 1,216 | 4,832 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 17 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 14.1× |
| P/S | – | 2.4× |
| P/B | – | 3.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 9.2× |
| P/FCF | – | 17.4× |
| PEG | – | 2.50 |
| FCF yield | – | 5.8% |
| Fair value | – | $52.19 |
| Margin of safety | – | −5.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.6% | 20.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.3% | 11.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 5.3% | 15.3% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 5.9% | 16.4% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 40.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 7.0% | 27.3% (better) |
| Operating margin | 1.3% | 21.5% (better) |
| Net margin | 0.75% | 17.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | −2.3% | 13.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | 2.3% | 26.2% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 3.0% | 42.8% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.25 | 0.00 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.69 (better) | −1.29 |
| Interest coverage | 3.3× | 3260× (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.34 | 4.39 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | – | 13.53 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.2% |
| Payout ratio | 8.3% | 16.4% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 5 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 38.0% |
| Buyback yield | – | 2.3% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 3.5% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 1.3% | 96.9% |
| Held by insiders | – | 1.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$44.7M |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 2.6% |
Go deeper
- APWC stock overview
- APWC income statement
- APWC valuation and score
- MLI stock overview
- MLI income statement
- MLI valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.