StockData

Asia Pacific Wire & Cable vs DMC Global

APWC and BOOM side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How APWC and BOOM compare

Asia Pacific Wire & Cable grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (3.6% versus −1.6% for DMC Global).

Asia Pacific Wire & Cable keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 0.75% compared with −1.2% at DMC Global.

DMC Global scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 3 for Asia Pacific Wire & Cable), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricAPWCBOOM
Size and price
Market cap–$161M
Share price$1.11$7.83
Change, 1 year−40.0%24.5%
Change, 5 years−60.6%−79.4%
Beta (5Y)0.461.37
Employees1,2161,500
StockData Score
Total score38 (better)
Valuation score04 (better)
Growth score00
Performance score11
Health score23 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–0.3×
P/B–0.6×
EV/EBITDA–4.7×
P/FCF–12.9×
FCF yield–7.7%
Fair value–$14.45
Margin of safety–45.8%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)3.6% (better)−1.6%
Revenue growth, 5Y average9.3%21.6% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)5.3%–
EPS growth (TTM)5.9%–
Profitability
Gross margin7.0%21.5% (better)
Operating margin1.3% (better)0.74%
Net margin0.75% (better)−1.2%
FCF margin−2.3%2.0% (better)
Return on equity2.3% (better)−2.8%
Return on invested capital3.0% (better)1.3%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.250.21 (better)
Net debt / EBITDA0.690.37 (better)
Interest coverage3.3× (better)0.8×
Current ratio2.342.56 (better)
Altman Z-score–1.72
Piotroski F-score55
Dividends and buybacks
Payout ratio8.3%–
Buyback yield–0.65%
Shareholder yield–0.65%
Ownership
Held by institutions1.3%69.2%
Held by insiders–16.4%
Insider net buying, 12 months–−$111K
Short interest, % of float–3.1%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.