Asia Pacific Wire & Cable vs Belden
APWC and BDC side by side, both in rolling, drawing, and extruding of nonferrous. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How APWC and BDC compare
Belden grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (17.7% versus 3.6% for Asia Pacific Wire & Cable).
Belden keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.6% compared with 0.75% at Asia Pacific Wire & Cable.
Belden pays a dividend yielding 0.19%; Asia Pacific Wire & Cable does not pay one.
Belden scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 3 for Asia Pacific Wire & Cable), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | APWC | BDC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $4.1B |
| Share price | $1.17 | $104.17 |
| Change, 1 year | −36.4% | −12.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −58.7% | 55.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.46 | 1.10 |
| Employees | 1,216 | 7,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 7 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 23.4× |
| P/S | – | 1.3× |
| P/B | – | 2.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 14.6× |
| P/FCF | – | 17.8× |
| PEG | – | 21.37 |
| FCF yield | – | 5.6% |
| Fair value | – | $77.58 |
| Margin of safety | – | −34.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.6% | 17.7% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.3% (better) | 9.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 5.3% (better) | −22.8% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 5.9% (better) | −21.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 7.0% | 36.8% (better) |
| Operating margin | 1.3% | 9.0% (better) |
| Net margin | 0.75% | 5.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | −2.3% | 7.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | 2.3% | 13.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 3.0% | 8.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.25 (better) | 2.19 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.69 (better) | 5.77 |
| Interest coverage | 3.3× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.34 (better) | 1.82 |
| Altman Z-score | – | 1.73 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.19% |
| Payout ratio | 8.3% | 4.4% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 0.00% |
| Buyback yield | – | −0.33% |
| Shareholder yield | – | −0.14% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 1.3% | 107% |
| Held by insiders | – | 1.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$2.9M |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 9.5% |
Go deeper
- APWC stock overview
- APWC income statement
- APWC valuation and score
- BDC stock overview
- BDC income statement
- BDC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.