Digital Turbine vs InterDigital
APPS and IDCC side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How APPS and IDCC compare
InterDigital is the larger company, worth 8.2 times as much as Digital Turbine ($7.7B against $939M).
Digital Turbine grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (21.6% versus −12.0% for InterDigital).
InterDigital keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 38.5% compared with −0.82% at Digital Turbine.
InterDigital pays a dividend yielding 0.95%; Digital Turbine does not pay one.
InterDigital scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 7 for Digital Turbine), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | APPS | IDCC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $939M | $7.7B |
| Share price | $7.76 | $300.72 |
| Change, 1 year | 31.1% | −17.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −87.2% | 319% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.53 | 0.90 |
| Employees | 620 | 460 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 18 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 33.1× |
| P/S | 1.5× (better) | 9.5× |
| P/B | 4.8× (better) | 6.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.8× (better) | 15.5× |
| P/FCF | – | 25.1× |
| PEG | – | 0.58 |
| FCF yield | – | 4.0% |
| Fair value | $9.06 | $192.63 |
| Margin of safety | 14.3% (better) | −56.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 21.6% (better) | −12.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 12.5% | 18.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −36.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −38.7% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 52.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 56.0% | – |
| Operating margin | 11.5% | 45.1% (better) |
| Net margin | −0.82% | 38.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | – | 37.8% |
| Return on equity | −3.0% | 26.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 7.3% | 83.8% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.80 | 0.25 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.15 (better) | −1.82 |
| Interest coverage | 1.1× | 9.9× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.25 | 1.90 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.81 | 7.91 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.95% |
| Payout ratio | – | 22.9% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 3 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 13.2% |
| Buyback yield | – | 1.1% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 2.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 64.5% | 106% |
| Held by insiders | 5.9% | 2.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.3K (better) | −$26.2M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 10.2% | 10.6% |
Go deeper
- APPS stock overview
- APPS income statement
- APPS valuation and score
- IDCC stock overview
- IDCC income statement
- IDCC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.