Apogee Enterprises vs Gibraltar Industries
APOG and ROCK side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How APOG and ROCK compare
Apogee Enterprises and Gibraltar Industries are about the same size, with market caps of $986M and $901M.
Gibraltar Industries grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (46.9% versus 3.0% for Apogee Enterprises).
Apogee Enterprises keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.7% compared with −3.1% at Gibraltar Industries.
Apogee Enterprises pays a dividend yielding 2.3%; Gibraltar Industries does not pay one.
Apogee Enterprises scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 6 for Gibraltar Industries), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | APOG | ROCK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $986M | $901M |
| Share price | $47.17 | $30.35 |
| Change, 1 year | 36.7% | −50.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 1.1% | −59.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.96 | 1.17 |
| Employees | 4,100 | 2,300 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 17 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 14.9× | – |
| P/S | 0.7× | 0.6× (better) |
| P/B | 1.9× | 1.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.3× (better) | 11.6× |
| P/FCF | 10.4× | – |
| FCF yield | 9.7% (better) | −2.8% |
| Fair value | $58.14 | $42.34 |
| Margin of safety | 18.9% | 28.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.0% | 46.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.7% (better) | 1.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 51.0% (better) | −1286% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 54.9% (better) | −2188% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 33.7% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 23.2% | 24.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | 7.2% | 7.4% (better) |
| Net margin | 4.7% (better) | −3.1% |
| FCF margin | 6.6% (better) | −1.6% |
| Return on equity | 13.1% (better) | −5.4% |
| Return on invested capital | 9.5% (better) | 5.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.64 (better) | 1.37 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.93 (better) | 6.62 |
| Interest coverage | 8.3× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.78 (better) | 1.75 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.88 (better) | 1.58 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.3% | – |
| Payout ratio | 33.3% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 14 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 6.6% | – |
| Buyback yield | 3.2% (better) | 0.50% |
| Shareholder yield | 5.4% (better) | 0.50% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 93.4% | 105% |
| Held by insiders | 3.0% | 1.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$51.5K | $1.6M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.2% | 6.6% |
Go deeper
- APOG stock overview
- APOG income statement
- APOG valuation and score
- ROCK stock overview
- ROCK income statement
- ROCK valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.