Apogee Enterprises vs Caesarstone
APOG and CSTE side by side, both in materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How APOG and CSTE compare
Apogee Enterprises grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (3.0% versus −10.4% for Caesarstone).
Apogee Enterprises keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.7% compared with −34.6% at Caesarstone.
Apogee Enterprises pays a dividend yielding 2.4%; Caesarstone does not pay one.
Apogee Enterprises scores higher on the StockData Score (20 against 3 for Caesarstone), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | APOG | CSTE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $944M | – |
| Share price | $45.24 | $1.72 |
| Change, 1 year | 22.9% | 47.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −5.8% | −87.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.97 | 0.76 |
| Employees | 4,100 | 1,266 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 20 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 3 | 3 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 14.3× | – |
| P/S | 0.7× | – |
| P/B | 1.8× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.0× | – |
| P/FCF | 9.9× | – |
| FCF yield | 10.1% | – |
| Fair value | $58.30 | – |
| Margin of safety | 22.4% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.0% (better) | −10.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.7% (better) | −4.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 51.0% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 54.9% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 33.7% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 23.2% (better) | 18.4% |
| Operating margin | 7.2% (better) | −31.6% |
| Net margin | 4.7% (better) | −34.6% |
| FCF margin | 6.6% (better) | −11.8% |
| Return on equity | 13.1% (better) | −66.9% |
| Return on invested capital | 9.5% (better) | −43.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.64 | 0.19 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.93 | – |
| Interest coverage | 8.3× (better) | −1821.9× |
| Current ratio | 1.78 | 1.83 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.85 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.4% | – |
| Payout ratio | 33.3% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 14 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 6.6% | – |
| Buyback yield | 3.3% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 5.7% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 93.6% | 5.9% |
| Held by insiders | 3.0% | 40.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$11.2K |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.9% | 0.40% |
Go deeper
- APOG stock overview
- APOG income statement
- APOG valuation and score
- CSTE stock overview
- CSTE income statement
- CSTE valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.