StockData

Apogee Enterprises vs Armstrong World Industries

APOG and AWI side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How APOG and AWI compare

Armstrong World Industries is the larger company, worth 7.5 times as much as Apogee Enterprises ($7.4B against $986M).

On earnings, Apogee Enterprises is cheaper: it trades at 14.9× trailing earnings, against 23.5× for Armstrong World Industries.

Armstrong World Industries grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (9.1% versus 3.0% for Apogee Enterprises).

Armstrong World Industries keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 18.4% compared with 4.7% at Apogee Enterprises.

Both pay dividends: Apogee Enterprises yields 2.3% and Armstrong World Industries 0.58%.

Armstrong World Industries scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 17 for Apogee Enterprises), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricAPOGAWI
Size and price
Market cap$986M$7.4B
Share price$47.17$175.74
Change, 1 year36.7%−6.8%
Change, 5 years1.1%56.8%
Beta (5Y)0.960.90
Employees4,1002,500
StockData Score
Total score1718 (better)
Valuation score3 (better)2
Growth score4 (better)2
Performance score35 (better)
Health score35 (better)
Dividend score44
Valuation
P/E14.9× (better)23.5×
P/S0.7× (better)4.2×
P/B1.9× (better)8.2×
EV/EBITDA8.3× (better)13.5×
P/FCF10.4× (better)33.7×
PEG–1.34
FCF yield9.7% (better)3.0%
Fair value$58.14$188.16
Margin of safety18.9% (better)6.6%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)3.0%9.1% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average2.7%11.6% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)51.0% (better)5.1%
EPS growth (TTM)54.9% (better)7.3%
EPS growth, 5Y average33.7%–
Profitability
Gross margin23.2%39.8% (better)
Operating margin7.2%25.8% (better)
Net margin4.7%18.4% (better)
FCF margin6.6%12.5% (better)
Return on equity13.1%36.0% (better)
Return on invested capital9.5%27.3% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.640.53 (better)
Net debt / EBITDA1.930.69 (better)
Interest coverage8.3×14.9× (better)
Current ratio1.78 (better)1.45
Altman Z-score2.887.08 (better)
Piotroski F-score69 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield2.3% (better)0.58%
Payout ratio33.3%18.4%
Years of dividend growth14 (better)7
Dividend growth, 5Y average6.6%9.3% (better)
Buyback yield3.2%3.6% (better)
Shareholder yield5.4% (better)4.2%
Ownership
Held by institutions93.4%104%
Held by insiders3.0%1.6%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$51.5K$100.0K (better)
Superinvestors holding–2
Short interest, % of float4.2%3.5%

Go deeper

Other comparisons

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.