Apple Hospitality REIT vs Pebblebrook Hotel Trust
APLE and PEB side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How APLE and PEB compare
Apple Hospitality REIT is the larger company, worth 1.8 times as much as Pebblebrook Hotel Trust ($4.4B against $2.4B).
Pebblebrook Hotel Trust grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (2.8% versus 1.2% for Apple Hospitality REIT).
Apple Hospitality REIT keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 12.2% compared with −4.6% at Pebblebrook Hotel Trust.
Both pay dividends: Apple Hospitality REIT yields 5.2% and Pebblebrook Hotel Trust 0.19%.
Apple Hospitality REIT scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 5 for Pebblebrook Hotel Trust), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | APLE | PEB |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.4B | $2.4B |
| Share price | $18.52 | $21.54 |
| Change, 1 year | 61.7% | 99.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 11.1% | −16.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.81 | 1.22 |
| Employees | 64 | 52 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 25.0× | – |
| P/S | 3.0× | 1.6× (better) |
| P/B | 1.4× | 1.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.6× (better) | 48.1× |
| P/FCF | 15.1× | – |
| PEG | 4.54 | – |
| FCF yield | 6.6% | – |
| Fair value | $16.97 | $14.92 |
| Margin of safety | −9.1% (better) | −44.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.2% | 2.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 18.6% | 27.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −3.1% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −1.3% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 40.2% (better) | 34.4% |
| Operating margin | 17.9% (better) | 3.1% |
| Net margin | 12.2% (better) | −4.6% |
| FCF margin | 20.2% | – |
| Return on equity | 5.5% (better) | −2.8% |
| Return on invested capital | 8.1% (better) | 1.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | 0.4× |
| Altman Z-score | 1.99 (better) | 0.42 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 5.2% (better) | 0.19% |
| Payout ratio | 129% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 27.5% | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.35% | 1.7% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 5.5% (better) | 1.9% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 86.9% | 127% |
| Held by insiders | 7.1% | 2.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $165K | $517K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.7% | 19.9% |
Go deeper
- APLE stock overview
- APLE income statement
- APLE valuation and score
- PEB stock overview
- PEB income statement
- PEB valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.