Ampco Pittsburgh vs Foster L B
AP and FSTR side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AP and FSTR compare
Foster L B is the larger company, worth 2.9 times as much as Ampco Pittsburgh ($445M against $152M).
Foster L B grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (15.8% versus 1.3% for Ampco Pittsburgh).
Foster L B keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.3% compared with −13.1% at Ampco Pittsburgh.
Foster L B scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 2 for Ampco Pittsburgh), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AP | FSTR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $152M | $445M |
| Share price | $7.34 | $42.31 |
| Change, 1 year | 276% | 50.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 47.1% | 152% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.29 | 0.94 |
| Employees | 1,432 | 1,191 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 2 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 32.8× |
| P/S | 0.4× (better) | 0.8× |
| P/B | 4.7× | 2.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 12.4× |
| P/FCF | 12.8× | 10.7× (better) |
| FCF yield | 7.8% | 9.3% (better) |
| Fair value | – | $36.11 |
| Margin of safety | – | −17.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.3% | 15.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.7% (better) | 1.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 182% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 187% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −0.57% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 18.9% | 20.9% (better) |
| Operating margin | −10.2% | 4.4% (better) |
| Net margin | −13.1% | 2.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | 2.7% | 7.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | −123% | 7.6% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −21.6% | 7.2% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 3.76 | 0.15 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 0.57 |
| Interest coverage | −4.0× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.68 | 1.89 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.66 | 5.15 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | 1.7% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 1.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 55.7% | 79.0% |
| Held by insiders | 44.8% | 21.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $29.4K (better) | −$6.6M |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.1% | 2.7% |
Go deeper
- AP stock overview
- AP income statement
- AP valuation and score
- FSTR stock overview
- FSTR income statement
- FSTR valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.