Alpha & Omega Semiconductor vs Silicon Motion Technology
AOSL and SIMO side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AOSL and SIMO compare
Silicon Motion Technology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.2% versus −3.2% for Alpha & Omega Semiconductor).
Silicon Motion Technology keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 13.8% compared with −6.9% at Alpha & Omega Semiconductor.
Silicon Motion Technology scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 5 for Alpha & Omega Semiconductor), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AOSL | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $924M | – |
| Share price | $30.53 | $179.50 |
| Change, 1 year | 61.3% | 92.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −31.6% | 157% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.12 | 1.21 |
| Employees | 2,519 | 2,009 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 1.4× | – |
| P/B | 1.2× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 75.7× | – |
| FCF yield | −7.8% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −3.2% | 10.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 0.66% | 10.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 37.4% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 37.9% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 9.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 22.6% | 48.3% (better) |
| Operating margin | −7.1% | 10.5% (better) |
| Net margin | −6.9% | 13.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | −10.7% | 0.71% (better) |
| Return on equity | −5.7% | 15.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −6.0% | 14.5% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −17.36 | – |
| Interest coverage | −92.3× | – |
| Current ratio | 3.51 (better) | 2.78 |
| Altman Z-score | 5.09 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | – |
| Payout ratio | – | 54.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 7.4% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 75.5% | 18.6% |
| Held by insiders | 19.1% | 0.84% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.0M | −$1.9M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 14.0% | – |
Go deeper
- AOSL stock overview
- AOSL income statement
- AOSL valuation and score
- SIMO stock overview
- SIMO income statement
- SIMO valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.