Alpha & Omega Semiconductor vs Magnachip Semiconductor
AOSL and MX side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AOSL and MX compare
Alpha & Omega Semiconductor is the larger company, worth 9.0 times as much as Magnachip Semiconductor ($823M against $91.3M).
Alpha & Omega Semiconductor grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−3.2% versus −7.4% for Magnachip Semiconductor).
Alpha & Omega Semiconductor keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −6.9% compared with −17.1% at Magnachip Semiconductor.
Magnachip Semiconductor scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 5 for Alpha & Omega Semiconductor), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AOSL | MX |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $823M | $91.3M |
| Share price | $27.20 | $2.50 |
| Change, 1 year | 43.2% | 3.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −39.1% | −86.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.08 | 1.18 |
| Employees | 2,519 | 711 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 1.2× | 0.5× (better) |
| P/B | 1.0× | 0.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 65.6× | – |
| FCF yield | −8.8% (better) | −36.7% |
| Fair value | – | $12.90 |
| Margin of safety | – | 80.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −3.2% (better) | −7.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 0.66% (better) | −18.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 22.6% (better) | 14.7% |
| Operating margin | −7.1% (better) | −24.2% |
| Net margin | −6.9% (better) | −17.1% |
| FCF margin | −10.7% (better) | −19.1% |
| Return on equity | −5.7% (better) | −12.0% |
| Return on invested capital | −6.0% (better) | −17.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 (better) | 0.19 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −17.36 | – |
| Interest coverage | −92.3× | – |
| Current ratio | 3.51 (better) | 2.65 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.71 (better) | 1.81 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.27% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.27% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 75.5% | 42.8% |
| Held by insiders | 19.1% | 18.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.0M | $1.2M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 14.0% | 3.5% |
Go deeper
- AOSL stock overview
- AOSL income statement
- AOSL valuation and score
- MX stock overview
- MX income statement
- MX valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.