Alpha & Omega Semiconductor vs Kulicke & Soffa Industries
AOSL and KLIC side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AOSL and KLIC compare
Kulicke & Soffa Industries is the larger company, worth 4.4 times as much as Alpha & Omega Semiconductor ($3.6B against $823M).
Kulicke & Soffa Industries grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (44.4% versus −3.2% for Alpha & Omega Semiconductor).
Kulicke & Soffa Industries keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 12.2% compared with −6.9% at Alpha & Omega Semiconductor.
Kulicke & Soffa Industries pays a dividend yielding 1.2%; Alpha & Omega Semiconductor does not pay one.
Kulicke & Soffa Industries scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 5 for Alpha & Omega Semiconductor), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AOSL | KLIC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $823M | $3.6B |
| Share price | $27.20 | $69.07 |
| Change, 1 year | 43.2% | 77.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −39.1% | 21.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.08 | 1.52 |
| Employees | 2,519 | 2,551 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 31.8× |
| P/S | 1.2× (better) | 3.8× |
| P/B | 1.0× (better) | 4.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | 65.6× | 21.9× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 87.9× |
| FCF yield | −8.8% | 1.1% (better) |
| Fair value | – | $64.04 |
| Margin of safety | – | −7.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −3.2% | 44.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 0.66% | 0.97% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 1845% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 2613% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −65.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 22.6% | 48.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | −7.1% | 13.2% (better) |
| Net margin | −6.9% | 12.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | −10.7% | 4.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | −5.7% | 13.2% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −6.0% | 29.7% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −17.36 | – |
| Interest coverage | −92.3× | 837× (better) |
| Current ratio | 3.51 (better) | 3.44 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.71 | 8.43 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.2% (better) |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 11.3% |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.67% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 1.9% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 75.5% | 92.7% |
| Held by insiders | 19.1% | 4.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.0M (better) | −$18.4M |
| Short interest, % of float | 14.0% | 4.4% |
Go deeper
- AOSL stock overview
- AOSL income statement
- AOSL valuation and score
- KLIC stock overview
- KLIC income statement
- KLIC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.