Antalpha Platform vs United States Natural Gas Fund, LP
ANTA and UNG side by side, both in commodity contracts brokers and dealers. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ANTA and UNG compare
United States Natural Gas Fund, LP scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 3 for Antalpha Platform), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ANTA | UNG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $497M |
| Share price | $2.00 | $10.46 |
| Change, 1 year | −82.7% | −28.2% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −84.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.15 | 0.01 |
| Employees | 113 | – |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 67.9% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 456% (better) | 7.4% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 226% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 18.8% | – |
| Net margin | 30.7% | – |
| FCF margin | −5.3% | – |
| Return on equity | 29.4% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 2.1% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 3.59 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 26.30 | – |
| Current ratio | 1.16 | – |
| Altman Z-score | – | 48.04 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | – | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 0.18% | 10.4% |
| Held by insiders | 84.2% | 0.00% |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.28% | 24.0% |
Go deeper
- ANTA stock overview
- ANTA income statement
- ANTA valuation and score
- UNG stock overview
- UNG income statement
- UNG valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.