AleAnna vs Pedevco
ANNA and PED side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ANNA and PED compare
Pedevco is the larger company, worth 1.3 times as much as AleAnna ($181M against $141M).
Pedevco grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (229% versus 195% for AleAnna).
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ANNA | PED |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $141M | $181M |
| Share price | $2.10 | $13.62 |
| Change, 1 year | −34.5% | 14.9% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −40.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | −0.44 | 0.46 |
| Employees | 9 | 25 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 6 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 10.5× | – |
| P/S | 2.9× | 1.6× (better) |
| P/B | – | 0.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.8× | 3.4× (better) |
| Fair value | $2.07 | $17.93 |
| Margin of safety | −1.7% | 24.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 195% | 229% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 41.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −333% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −338% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 31.0% (better) | 14.0% |
| Net margin | – | −14.6% |
| Return on equity | – | −10.8% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 8.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | – | 3.0× |
| Current ratio | 1.10 (better) | 0.78 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.78 (better) | 0.61 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 5.7% | 56.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.2M | $1.8M (better) |
Go deeper
- ANNA stock overview
- ANNA income statement
- ANNA valuation and score
- PED stock overview
- PED income statement
- PED valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.