StockData

ANI Pharmaceuticals vs Supernus

ANIP and SUPN side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ANIP and SUPN compare

ANI Pharmaceuticals grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (25.9% versus 16.3% for Supernus).

Supernus keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 32.8% compared with 11.2% at ANI Pharmaceuticals.

ANI Pharmaceuticals scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 6 for Supernus), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricANIPSUPN
Size and price
Market cap$1.6B–
Share price$71.44$29.72
Change, 1 year−18.1%−1.3%
Change, 5 years64.1%–
Beta (5Y)0.610.70
Employees970838
StockData Score
Total score15 (better)6
Valuation score5 (better)0
Growth score23 (better)
Performance score4 (better)2
Health score4 (better)1
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E13.5×–
P/S1.6×–
P/B2.6×–
EV/EBITDA6.1×–
P/FCF8.0×–
FCF yield12.5%–
Fair value$153.69–
Margin of safety53.5%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)25.9% (better)16.3%
Revenue growth, 5Y average33.5%–
Net income growth (TTM)188%252% (better)
EPS growth (TTM)225%253% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin61.1%85.0% (better)
Operating margin16.0%40.6% (better)
Net margin11.2%32.8% (better)
FCF margin19.7% (better)2.3%
Return on equity20.4%–
Return on invested capital23.0%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.47–
Net debt / EBITDA−0.490.32 (better)
Interest coverage5.4×32.8× (better)
Current ratio2.75 (better)0.61
Altman Z-score2.57–
Piotroski F-score7 (better)4
Dividends and buybacks
Payout ratio0.00%–
Buyback yield1.2%–
Shareholder yield1.2%–
Ownership
Held by institutions100%104%
Held by insiders12.3%16.4%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$13.6M−$2.5M (better)
Short interest, % of float17.8%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.