Abercrombie & Fitch vs TJX Companies
ANF and TJX side by side, both in family clothing stores. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ANF and TJX compare
TJX Companies is the larger company, worth 22 times as much as Abercrombie & Fitch ($154B against $7.0B).
On earnings, Abercrombie & Fitch is cheaper: it trades at 14.1× trailing earnings, against 25.9× for TJX Companies.
TJX Companies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (7.7% versus 4.7% for Abercrombie & Fitch).
Abercrombie & Fitch keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 10.0% compared with 9.7% at TJX Companies.
TJX Companies pays a dividend yielding 1.3%; Abercrombie & Fitch does not pay one.
TJX Companies scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 14 for Abercrombie & Fitch), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ANF | TJX |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $7.0B | $154B |
| Share price | $164.44 | $140.31 |
| Change, 1 year | 124% | −0.97% |
| Change, 5 years | 256% | 97.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.31 | 0.64 |
| Employees | 43K | 377K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 | 19 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 4 | 4 |
| Performance score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 14.1× (better) | 25.9× |
| P/S | 1.3× (better) | 2.5× |
| P/B | 5.2× (better) | 14.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.1× (better) | 16.1× |
| P/FCF | 12.3× (better) | 26.3× |
| PEG | 0.03 (better) | 1.45 |
| FCF yield | 8.1% (better) | 3.8% |
| Fair value | $138.87 | $100.78 |
| Margin of safety | −18.4% (better) | −39.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 4.7% | 7.7% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 11.0% | 13.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −0.93% | 22.0% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 10.5% | 23.2% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 134% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 63.7% (better) | 32.0% |
| Operating margin | 13.7% | – |
| Net margin | 10.0% (better) | 9.7% |
| FCF margin | 10.6% (better) | 9.4% |
| Return on equity | 40.5% | 62.2% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 74.8% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.27 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −0.33 |
| Current ratio | 1.41 (better) | 1.15 |
| Altman Z-score | 5.72 (better) | 5.62 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.3% |
| Payout ratio | – | 32.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 5 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 45.6% |
| Buyback yield | 7.0% (better) | 1.6% |
| Shareholder yield | 7.0% (better) | 2.9% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 113% | 92.6% |
| Held by insiders | 2.2% | 0.14% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$50.3M | −$40.8M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 10.7% | 1.7% |
Go deeper
- ANF stock overview
- ANF income statement
- ANF valuation and score
- TJX stock overview
- TJX income statement
- TJX valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.