Arista Networks vs NetApp
ANET and NTAP side by side, both in computer and office equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ANET and NTAP compare
Arista Networks is the larger company, worth 5.4 times as much as NetApp ($213B against $39.1B).
On earnings, NetApp is cheaper: it trades at 28.1× trailing earnings, against 53.3× for Arista Networks.
Arista Networks grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (32.6% versus 12.7% for NetApp).
Arista Networks keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 38.4% compared with 21.8% at NetApp.
NetApp pays a dividend yielding 1.0%; Arista Networks does not pay one.
NetApp scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 15 for Arista Networks), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ANET | NTAP |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $213B | $39.1B |
| Share price | $168.86 | $199.18 |
| Change, 1 year | 4.2% | 74.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 409% | 119% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.66 | 1.18 |
| Employees | 5,115 | 12K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 | 18 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 6 | 6 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 53.3× | 28.1× (better) |
| P/S | 20.2× | 6.0× (better) |
| P/B | 14.4× (better) | 26.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | 43.0× | 18.9× (better) |
| P/FCF | 41.3× | 23.7× (better) |
| PEG | 1.44 (better) | 8.98 |
| FCF yield | 2.4% | 4.2% (better) |
| Fair value | $115.97 | $157.07 |
| Margin of safety | −45.6% | −26.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 32.6% (better) | 12.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 31.2% (better) | 1.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 24.4% (better) | 21.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 24.8% | 25.4% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 40.6% (better) | 14.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 63.0% | 80.3% (better) |
| Operating margin | 43.1% (better) | 28.5% |
| Net margin | 38.4% (better) | 21.8% |
| FCF margin | 48.9% (better) | 25.4% |
| Return on equity | 31.5% | 115% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 210% | 528% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 1.66 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −0.54 |
| Current ratio | 2.96 (better) | 1.24 |
| Altman Z-score | 16.76 (better) | 3.78 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.0% |
| Payout ratio | – | 29.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 1.6% |
| Buyback yield | 0.29% | 2.2% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.29% | 3.2% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 71.4% | 99.0% |
| Held by insiders | 16.7% | 0.48% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.3B | −$31.3M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.1% | 5.5% |
Go deeper
- ANET stock overview
- ANET income statement
- ANET valuation and score
- NTAP stock overview
- NTAP income statement
- NTAP valuation and score
Other comparisons
- ANET vs CSCO
- ANET vs FFIV
- ANET vs FTNT
- ANET vs PANW
- FTNT vs NTAP
- NTAP vs P
- NTAP vs PANW
- NTAP vs STX
- NTAP vs WDC
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.