Amentum vs Global Payments
AMTM and GPN side by side, both in miscellaneous business services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AMTM and GPN compare
Global Payments is the larger company, worth 4.5 times as much as Amentum ($24.3B against $5.4B).
Global Payments grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (48.5% versus 11.4% for Amentum).
Amentum keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 1.4% compared with −11.2% at Global Payments.
Global Payments pays a dividend yielding 1.1%; Amentum does not pay one.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AMTM | GPN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.4B | $24.3B |
| Share price | $21.95 | $91.90 |
| Change, 1 year | −4.4% | 18.7% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −27.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.21 | 1.17 |
| Employees | 50K | 26K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 9 |
| Valuation score | 4 | 4 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 26.4× | – |
| P/S | 0.4× (better) | 2.1× |
| P/B | 1.1× | 1.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.8× | 11.2× (better) |
| P/FCF | 11.3× | – |
| FCF yield | 8.8% (better) | −0.70% |
| Fair value | $27.54 | $131.86 |
| Margin of safety | 20.3% | 30.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 11.4% | 48.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 0.75% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 292% (better) | −174% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 113% (better) | −164% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 24.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 10.2% | 61.5% (better) |
| Operating margin | 4.2% | 6.8% (better) |
| Net margin | 1.4% (better) | −11.2% |
| FCF margin | 3.4% (better) | −1.5% |
| Return on equity | 4.5% (better) | −5.6% |
| Return on invested capital | 5.5% (better) | 1.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.81 (better) | 0.97 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 5.65 | 4.52 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 0.8× |
| Current ratio | 1.52 (better) | 0.82 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.02 (better) | 0.65 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 5.1% |
| Buyback yield | – | 5.1% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 6.2% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 89.6% | 107% |
| Held by insiders | 32.3% | 16.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $94.2K |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.5% | 6.5% |
Go deeper
- AMTM stock overview
- AMTM income statement
- AMTM valuation and score
- GPN stock overview
- GPN income statement
- GPN valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.