American Shared Hospital Services vs Fulgent Genetics
AMS and FLGT side by side, both in health services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AMS and FLGT compare
Fulgent Genetics is the larger company, worth 94 times as much as American Shared Hospital Services ($679M against $7.2M).
American Shared Hospital Services grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (4.9% versus 4.7% for Fulgent Genetics).
American Shared Hospital Services keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −7.7% compared with −27.5% at Fulgent Genetics.
Fulgent Genetics scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 6 for American Shared Hospital Services), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AMS | FLGT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $7.2M | $679M |
| Share price | $1.08 | $24.66 |
| Change, 1 year | −48.1% | −15.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −59.4% | −73.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.37 | 0.89 |
| Employees | 44 | 1,300 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 8 (better) |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.2× (better) | 2.1× |
| P/B | 0.3× (better) | 0.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | 1.8× | – |
| P/FCF | 1.0× | – |
| FCF yield | 96.2% (better) | −0.21% |
| Fair value | $4.19 | $46.08 |
| Margin of safety | 74.2% (better) | 46.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 4.9% (better) | 4.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.5% (better) | −5.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 16.7% | 33.8% (better) |
| Operating margin | −13.0% (better) | −39.2% |
| Net margin | −7.7% (better) | −27.5% |
| FCF margin | 22.4% (better) | −0.42% |
| Return on equity | −10.1% | −8.6% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −11.9% (better) | −12.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | −2.8× (better) | −1307.9× |
| Current ratio | 0.81 | 5.34 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.45 | 5.18 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | 9.5% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 9.5% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 7.6% | 57.0% |
| Held by insiders | 38.1% | 39.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $1.3M (better) | −$286K |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.28% | 12.1% |
Go deeper
- AMS stock overview
- AMS income statement
- AMS valuation and score
- FLGT stock overview
- FLGT income statement
- FLGT valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.