StockData

Alpha Metallurgical Resources vs Ramaco Resources

AMR and METC side by side, both in energy. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How AMR and METC compare

Alpha Metallurgical Resources grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−5.7% versus −17.7% for Ramaco Resources).

Alpha Metallurgical Resources keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −2.4% compared with −12.0% at Ramaco Resources.

Alpha Metallurgical Resources scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 6 for Ramaco Resources), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricAMRMETC
Size and price
Market cap$2.0B–
Share price$153.86$6.85
Change, 1 year−9.5%−71.9%
Change, 5 years233%−38.2%
Beta (5Y)0.840.70
Employees3,960900
StockData Score
Total score8 (better)6
Valuation score2 (better)0
Growth score11
Performance score00
Health score55
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.9×–
P/B1.3×–
EV/EBITDA15.8×–
FCF yield−0.71%–
Fair value$156.99–
Margin of safety2.0%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−5.7% (better)−17.7%
Revenue growth, 5Y average8.5%26.0% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin9.3%13.5% (better)
Operating margin−2.4% (better)−14.1%
Net margin−2.4% (better)−12.0%
FCF margin−0.66%–
Return on equity−3.2% (better)−17.1%
Return on invested capital−3.4% (better)−27.8%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.01 (better)0.00
Net debt / EBITDA−3.14–
Interest coverage−14.4×–
Current ratio3.004.23 (better)
Altman Z-score3.97–
Piotroski F-score44
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions88.0%83.0%
Held by insiders20.3%16.0%
Insider net buying, 12 months$49.6M (better)−$66.1M
Superinvestors holding1–
Short interest, % of float14.3%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.