Amplify Energy vs Vitesse Energy
AMPY and VTS side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AMPY and VTS compare
Vitesse Energy is the larger company, worth 3.8 times as much as Amplify Energy ($649M against $169M).
Vitesse Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.6% versus −28.2% for Amplify Energy).
Amplify Energy keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 12.5% compared with −15.4% at Vitesse Energy.
Vitesse Energy pays a dividend yielding 12.2%; Amplify Energy does not pay one.
Amplify Energy scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 9 for Vitesse Energy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AMPY | VTS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $169M | $649M |
| Share price | $4.07 | $15.42 |
| Change, 1 year | −29.6% | −26.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 52.4% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.69 | 0.69 |
| Employees | 184 | 37 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 7.5× | – |
| P/S | 0.9× (better) | 2.2× |
| P/B | 0.4× (better) | 1.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | 2.4× (better) | 18.0× |
| Fair value | $9.11 | $19.18 |
| Margin of safety | 55.3% (better) | 19.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −28.2% | 10.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.4% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −322% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −337% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 97.0% | – |
| Operating margin | 23.0% (better) | 12.0% |
| Net margin | 12.5% (better) | −15.4% |
| Return on equity | 6.1% (better) | −7.6% |
| Return on invested capital | 7.8% (better) | 4.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.15 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | 3.2× |
| Current ratio | 0.80 (better) | 0.65 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.14 | 1.41 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 12.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 2 |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 12.2% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 56.9% | 66.2% |
| Held by insiders | 11.3% | 19.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$6.4M (better) | −$7.3M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.7% | 17.1% |
Go deeper
- AMPY stock overview
- AMPY income statement
- AMPY valuation and score
- VTS stock overview
- VTS income statement
- VTS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.