Amplify Energy vs SandRidge Energy
AMPY and SD side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AMPY and SD compare
SandRidge Energy is the larger company, worth 3.0 times as much as Amplify Energy ($482M against $160M).
On earnings, SandRidge Energy is cheaper: it trades at 5.0× trailing earnings, against 7.1× for Amplify Energy.
SandRidge Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (24.9% versus −28.2% for Amplify Energy).
SandRidge Energy keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 50.1% compared with 12.5% at Amplify Energy.
SandRidge Energy pays a dividend yielding 5.4%; Amplify Energy does not pay one.
SandRidge Energy scores higher on the StockData Score (22 against 13 for Amplify Energy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AMPY | SD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $160M | $482M |
| Share price | $3.85 | $12.99 |
| Change, 1 year | −32.3% | 1.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 44.2% | 10.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.67 | 0.62 |
| Employees | 184 | 102 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 | 22 (better) |
| Valuation score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 7.1× | 5.0× (better) |
| P/S | 0.8× (better) | 2.5× |
| P/B | 0.4× (better) | 0.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | 2.2× (better) | 3.3× |
| P/FCF | – | 10.2× |
| FCF yield | – | 9.8% |
| Fair value | $9.15 | $19.50 |
| Margin of safety | 57.9% (better) | 33.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −28.2% | 24.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.4% | 6.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 47.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 47.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 97.0% | – |
| Operating margin | 23.0% | 38.4% (better) |
| Net margin | 12.5% | 50.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | – | 24.2% |
| Return on equity | 6.1% | 18.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 7.8% | 16.8% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.15 | – |
| Current ratio | 0.80 | 1.52 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.11 | 1.93 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 5.4% |
| Payout ratio | – | 23.3% |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.01% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 5.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 56.9% | 81.7% |
| Held by insiders | 11.3% | 14.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$6.4M | – |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.7% | 5.1% |
Go deeper
- AMPY stock overview
- AMPY income statement
- AMPY valuation and score
- SD stock overview
- SD income statement
- SD valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.