StockData

Amplitude vs PagerDuty

AMPL and PD side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How AMPL and PD compare

Amplitude is the larger company, worth 1.7 times as much as PagerDuty ($2.1B against $1.2B).

Amplitude grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.2% versus 2.3% for PagerDuty).

PagerDuty keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 37.2% compared with −25.2% at Amplitude.

Amplitude scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 7 for PagerDuty), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricAMPLPD
Size and price
Market cap$2.1B$1.2B
Share price$17.21$15.68
Change, 1 year60.4%−0.19%
Change, 5 years−74.8%−59.8%
Beta (5Y)1.551.66
Employees7801,155
StockData Score
Total score10 (better)7
Valuation score01 (better)
Growth score3 (better)2
Performance score13 (better)
Health score6 (better)1
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E–7.8×
P/S5.4×2.5× (better)
P/B16.8×5.3× (better)
EV/EBITDA–17.3×
P/FCF68.1×9.7× (better)
FCF yield1.5%10.3% (better)
Fair value$4.93$14.41
Margin of safety−249%−8.8% (better)
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)20.2% (better)2.3%
Revenue growth, 5Y average27.3% (better)18.2%
Profitability
Gross margin70.6%84.8% (better)
Operating margin–6.5%
Net margin−25.2%37.2% (better)
FCF margin8.0%25.6% (better)
Return on equity−51.3%89.2% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00–
Interest coverage–3.8×
Current ratio1.042.02 (better)
Altman Z-score4.31 (better)1.44
Piotroski F-score57 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield4.9%16.9% (better)
Shareholder yield4.9%16.9% (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions64.4%92.9%
Held by insiders34.5%9.4%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$11.0M (better)−$13.9M
Short interest, % of float10.1%10.5%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.