Amplitude vs Sprinklr
AMPL and CXM side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AMPL and CXM compare
Amplitude is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as Sprinklr ($2.2B against $1.6B).
Amplitude grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.2% versus 6.3% for Sprinklr).
Sprinklr keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.7% compared with −25.2% at Amplitude.
Sprinklr scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 10 for Amplitude), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AMPL | CXM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.2B | $1.6B |
| Share price | $17.34 | $6.80 |
| Change, 1 year | 57.1% | −9.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −74.6% | −59.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.55 | 1.38 |
| Employees | 780 | 3,258 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 68.0× |
| P/S | 5.5× | 1.8× (better) |
| P/B | 16.9× | 3.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 20.7× |
| P/FCF | 68.6× | 12.4× (better) |
| FCF yield | 1.5% | 8.1% (better) |
| Fair value | $4.88 | $5.93 |
| Margin of safety | −256% | −14.6% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 20.2% (better) | 6.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 27.3% (better) | 17.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −80.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −77.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 70.6% (better) | 65.6% |
| Operating margin | – | 5.3% |
| Net margin | −25.2% | 2.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | 8.0% | 14.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | −51.3% | 4.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 6.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 1.04 | 1.56 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 4.35 (better) | 2.67 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 4.9% | 8.7% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 4.9% | 8.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 64.4% | 56.4% |
| Held by insiders | 33.3% | 60.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$11.0M | −$10.2M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 10.0% | 12.2% |
Go deeper
- AMPL stock overview
- AMPL income statement
- AMPL valuation and score
- CXM stock overview
- CXM income statement
- CXM valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.