AMN Healthcare Services vs ManpowerGroup
AMN and MAN side by side, both in personnel supply services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AMN and MAN compare
ManpowerGroup is the larger company, worth 1.5 times as much as AMN Healthcare Services ($2.1B against $1.5B).
AMN Healthcare Services grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (29.5% versus 7.3% for ManpowerGroup).
ManpowerGroup pays a dividend yielding 3.1%; AMN Healthcare Services does not pay one.
AMN Healthcare Services scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 8 for ManpowerGroup), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AMN | MAN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.5B | $2.1B |
| Share price | $37.90 | $46.11 |
| Change, 1 year | 118% | 66.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −68.0% | −53.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.72 | 0.88 |
| Employees | 2,664 | 25K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 13.8× | – |
| P/S | 0.4× | 0.1× (better) |
| P/B | 1.9× | 1.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.8× (better) | 7.8× |
| P/FCF | 4.5× (better) | 290× |
| FCF yield | 22.3% (better) | 0.35% |
| Fair value | $55.46 | $54.00 |
| Margin of safety | 31.7% (better) | 14.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 29.5% (better) | 7.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.7% (better) | −0.05% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 28.4% (better) | 16.1% |
| Operating margin | 5.8% (better) | 1.6% |
| Net margin | 3.1% | – |
| FCF margin | 9.3% (better) | 0.04% |
| Return on equity | 15.4% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 9.8% (better) | 5.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.96 | 0.52 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.45 (better) | 2.26 |
| Interest coverage | 6.1× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.21 (better) | 1.05 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.29 | 3.30 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 3.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | −8.6% |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.01% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 3.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 120% | 119% |
| Held by insiders | 0.87% | 1.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$114K | – |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.1% | 9.1% |
Go deeper
- AMN stock overview
- AMN income statement
- AMN valuation and score
- MAN stock overview
- MAN income statement
- MAN valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.