Advanced Micro Devices vs Broadcom
AMD and AVGO side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AMD and AVGO compare
Broadcom is the larger company, worth 1.9 times as much as Advanced Micro Devices ($1.6T against $824B).
Broadcom grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (48.7% versus 39.5% for Advanced Micro Devices).
Broadcom pays a dividend yielding 0.80%; Advanced Micro Devices does not pay one.
Advanced Micro Devices scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 12 for Broadcom), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AMD | AVGO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $824B | $1.6T |
| Share price | $504.80 | $326.08 |
| Change, 1 year | 91.0% | −15.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 270% | 483% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.88 | 1.83 |
| Employees | 31K | 33K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 (better) | 12 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 130× | – |
| P/S | 20.0× | 17.5× (better) |
| P/B | 12.3× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 125× | 37.2× (better) |
| P/FCF | 98.1× | 39.5× (better) |
| PEG | 2.78 | – |
| FCF yield | 1.0% | 2.5% (better) |
| Fair value | $153.25 | – |
| Margin of safety | −229% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 39.5% | 48.7% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 28.8% (better) | 21.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 127% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 124% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 5.2% | 49.8% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 53.2% | 68.8% (better) |
| Operating margin | 15.7% | 48.0% (better) |
| Net margin | 15.6% | – |
| FCF margin | 20.3% | 44.2% (better) |
| Return on equity | 10.1% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 9.7% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.05 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −1.52 | 0.83 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 44.1× (better) | 13.7× |
| Current ratio | 2.61 (better) | 2.50 |
| Altman Z-score | 29.80 (better) | 12.15 |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.80% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 9 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 12.7% |
| Buyback yield | 0.04% | 0.54% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.04% | 1.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 72.8% | 77.9% |
| Held by insiders | 0.43% | 0.79% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$369M (better) | −$1.2B |
| Superinvestors holding | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.4% | 1.1% |
Go deeper
- AMD stock overview
- AMD income statement
- AMD valuation and score
- AVGO stock overview
- AVGO income statement
- AVGO valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.