StockData

AMC Entertainment vs Reading International

AMC and RDI side by side, both in communication services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How AMC and RDI compare

AMC Entertainment grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (15.9% versus −2.2% for Reading International).

AMC Entertainment keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −2.6% compared with −5.9% at Reading International.

AMC Entertainment scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 1 for Reading International), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricAMCRDI
Size and price
Market cap$3.0B–
Share price$3.34$1.96
Change, 1 year37.4%49.6%
Change, 5 years−99.2%−59.5%
Beta (5Y)1.840.61
Employees33K6,000
StockData Score
Total score5 (better)1
Valuation score2 (better)0
Growth score1 (better)0
Performance score2 (better)1
Health score00
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.5×–
EV/EBITDA8.0×–
P/FCF17.7×–
FCF yield5.6%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)15.9% (better)−2.2%
Revenue growth, 5Y average31.3% (better)21.1%
Profitability
Operating margin7.8% (better)1.2%
Net margin−2.6% (better)−5.9%
FCF margin3.0% (better)1.5%
Return on invested capital20.1% (better)1.5%
Financial health
Net debt / EBITDA4.00 (better)11.11
Interest coverage0.8× (better)0.1×
Current ratio0.58 (better)0.23
Altman Z-score−0.61–
Piotroski F-score23 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions49.7%45.6%
Held by insiders0.67%17.6%
Insider net buying, 12 months$345K–
Superinvestors holding11
Short interest, % of float4.6%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.