StockData

Amber International vs Metalpha Technology

AMBR and MATH side by side, both in finance services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How AMBR and MATH compare

Amber International grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (784% versus −16.7% for Metalpha Technology).

Amber International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.7% compared with 3.5% at Metalpha Technology.

Amber International scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 8 for Metalpha Technology), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricAMBRMATH
Size and price
Share price$1.61$0.930
Change, 1 year−11.0%−60.6%
Change, 5 years−97.7%−42.2%
Beta (5Y)0.760.69
Employees29535
StockData Score
Total score11 (better)8
Valuation score00
Growth score3 (better)1
Performance score3 (better)2
Health score55
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)784% (better)−16.7%
Revenue growth, 5Y average−23.7%177% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)–−91.9%
EPS growth (TTM)–−92.9%
Profitability
Gross margin74.8% (better)41.4%
Operating margin3.9% (better)3.6%
Net margin5.7% (better)3.5%
FCF margin−37.3%–
Return on equity4.1%–
Return on invested capital3.0%–
Financial health
Interest coverage36.5×76.1× (better)
Current ratio1.22 (better)1.12
Piotroski F-score6 (better)2
Ownership
Held by institutions6.6%0.85%
Held by insiders82.5%14.0%
Short interest, % of float–0.11%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.