StockData

Amber International vs 9F

AMBR and JFU side by side, both in finance services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How AMBR and JFU compare

Amber International grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (784% versus 7.5% for 9F).

9F keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 125% compared with 5.7% at Amber International.

Amber International scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 8 for 9F), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricAMBRJFU
Size and price
Share price$1.96$2.14
Change, 1 year12.0%−53.7%
Change, 5 years−97.2%−91.7%
Beta (5Y)0.790.49
Employees295185
StockData Score
Total score11 (better)8
Valuation score00
Growth score3 (better)1
Performance score33
Health score5 (better)4
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)784% (better)7.5%
Revenue growth, 5Y average−23.7% (better)−36.1%
Net income growth (TTM)–237%
EPS growth (TTM)–238%
Profitability
Gross margin74.8%81.2% (better)
Operating margin3.9%8.4% (better)
Net margin5.7%125% (better)
FCF margin−37.3%153% (better)
Return on equity4.1%4.6% (better)
Return on invested capital3.0% (better)0.26%
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.00
Interest coverage36.5×–
Current ratio1.22–
Piotroski F-score67 (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions6.6%0.01%
Held by insiders82.5%53.6%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.