StockData

Amber International vs Exodus Movement

AMBR and EXOD side by side, both in finance services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How AMBR and EXOD compare

Amber International grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (784% versus −19.0% for Exodus Movement).

Amber International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.7% compared with −101% at Exodus Movement.

Amber International scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 8 for Exodus Movement), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricAMBREXOD
Size and price
Market cap–$133M
Share price$1.96$4.39
Change, 1 year12.0%−78.0%
Change, 5 years−97.2%−82.4%
Beta (5Y)0.790.81
Employees295215
StockData Score
Total score11 (better)8
Valuation score03 (better)
Growth score3 (better)0
Performance score3 (better)0
Health score55
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–1.2×
P/B–0.7×
FCF yield–−66.3%
Fair value–$8.43
Margin of safety–48.0%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)784% (better)−19.0%
Revenue growth, 5Y average−23.7%–
Net income growth (TTM)–−203%
Profitability
Gross margin74.8%–
Operating margin3.9%–
Net margin5.7% (better)−101%
FCF margin−37.3% (better)−79.3%
Return on equity4.1% (better)−45.3%
Return on invested capital3.0%–
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.00
Interest coverage36.5×–
Current ratio1.22 (better)1.20
Altman Z-score–1.09
Piotroski F-score6 (better)2
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield–3.4%
Shareholder yield–3.4%
Ownership
Held by institutions6.6%10.7%
Held by insiders82.5%74.1%
Insider net buying, 12 months–−$332K
Short interest, % of float–4.1%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.