Ambiq Micro vs FTC Solar
AMBQ and FTCI side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AMBQ and FTCI compare
Ambiq Micro is the larger company, worth 66 times as much as FTC Solar ($1.1B against $17.3M).
Ambiq Micro grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (63.4% versus 36.3% for FTC Solar).
FTC Solar keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −22.2% compared with −29.7% at Ambiq Micro.
Ambiq Micro scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 5 for FTC Solar), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AMBQ | FTCI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.1B | $17.3M |
| Share price | $47.46 | $1.05 |
| Change, 1 year | 69.2% | −90.5% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −98.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.95 | 2.17 |
| Employees | 202 | 232 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 9.7× | 0.2× (better) |
| P/B | 2.8× | – |
| FCF yield | – | −45.7% |
| Fair value | $37.67 | – |
| Margin of safety | −26.0% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 63.4% (better) | 36.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | −11.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 44.8% (better) | 3.1% |
| Operating margin | −36.0% (better) | −36.7% |
| Net margin | −29.7% | −22.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | – | −7.2% |
| Return on equity | −12.2% | – |
| Return on invested capital | −103% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | −2.3× |
| Current ratio | 16.55 (better) | 0.86 |
| Altman Z-score | 23.14 (better) | −5.17 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | −30.3% (better) | −46.5% |
| Shareholder yield | −30.3% (better) | −46.5% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 115% | 8.6% |
| Held by insiders | 13.5% | 28.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$38.9M | $273K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 12.4% | 13.8% |
Go deeper
- AMBQ stock overview
- AMBQ income statement
- AMBQ valuation and score
- FTCI stock overview
- FTCI income statement
- FTCI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.