StockData

AlTi Global vs Maase

ALTI and MAAS side by side, both in services allied with the exchange of securities. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ALTI and MAAS compare

AlTi Global grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (27.1% versus −76.5% for Maase).

AlTi Global keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −13.8% compared with −102% at Maase.

AlTi Global scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 3 for Maase), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricALTIMAAS
Size and price
Market cap$246M–
Share price$1.58$9.98
Change, 1 year−61.2%169%
Change, 5 years−84.1%−97.2%
Beta (5Y)0.580.37
Employees490100
StockData Score
Total score9 (better)3
Valuation score3 (better)0
Growth score2 (better)1
Performance score1 (better)0
Health score3 (better)2
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.9×–
P/B0.4×–
P/FCF23.1×–
FCF yield4.3%–
Fair value$7.70–
Margin of safety79.5%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)27.1% (better)−76.5%
Revenue growth, 5Y average–−0.83%
Profitability
Gross margin–13.7%
Operating margin−14.1%−12.9% (better)
Net margin−13.8% (better)−102%
FCF margin3.8% (better)−58.2%
Return on equity−6.3% (better)−7.1%
Return on invested capital−5.4%−0.71% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.01 (better)
Interest coverage−50.5×−16.9× (better)
Current ratio–10.67
Altman Z-score0.18–
Piotroski F-score33
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield2.3%–
Shareholder yield2.3%–
Ownership
Held by institutions22.4%0.07%
Held by insiders27.3%81.0%
Short interest, % of float1.9%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.