Alta Equipment vs Global Industrial
ALTG and GIC side by side, both in wholesale trade-durable goods. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ALTG and GIC compare
Global Industrial is the larger company, worth 10 times as much as Alta Equipment ($1.8B against $179M).
Global Industrial grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.4% versus −0.68% for Alta Equipment).
Global Industrial keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 6.1% compared with −2.8% at Alta Equipment.
Global Industrial pays a dividend yielding 1.8%; Alta Equipment does not pay one.
Global Industrial scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 6 for Alta Equipment), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ALTG | GIC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $179M | $1.8B |
| Share price | $5.49 | $47.15 |
| Change, 1 year | 9.6% | 75.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −67.4% | 8.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.59 | 0.94 |
| Employees | 2,750 | 1,980 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 17 (better) |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 21.0× |
| P/S | 0.1× (better) | 1.3× |
| P/B | – | 5.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.4× (better) | 13.8× |
| P/FCF | 2.1× (better) | 20.6× |
| FCF yield | 46.9% (better) | 4.9% |
| Fair value | $23.90 | $40.06 |
| Margin of safety | 77.0% (better) | −17.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −0.68% | 8.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 16.0% (better) | 6.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 31.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 31.0% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 1.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 25.9% | 36.4% (better) |
| Operating margin | 1.0% | 8.1% (better) |
| Net margin | −2.8% | 6.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | 4.6% | 6.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 26.9% |
| Return on invested capital | 3.2% | 33.6% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.19 | – |
| Interest coverage | 0.2× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.35 | 2.24 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.39 | 7.48 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 9 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.8% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 48.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | −21.8% |
| Buyback yield | – | −0.11% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 1.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 64.9% | 34.0% |
| Held by insiders | 44.9% | 63.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $468K (better) | −$2.1M |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.8% | 4.9% |
Go deeper
- ALTG stock overview
- ALTG income statement
- ALTG valuation and score
- GIC stock overview
- GIC income statement
- GIC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.