Allison Transmission vs Dauch
ALSN and DCH side by side, both in motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ALSN and DCH compare
Allison Transmission is the larger company, worth 7.9 times as much as Dauch ($8.9B against $1.1B).
Dauch grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (41.0% versus 37.6% for Allison Transmission).
Allison Transmission keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 12.0% compared with −2.0% at Dauch.
Allison Transmission pays a dividend yielding 1.1%; Dauch does not pay one.
Allison Transmission scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 7 for Dauch), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ALSN | DCH |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $8.9B | $1.1B |
| Share price | $108.05 | $4.78 |
| Change, 1 year | 32.4% | −28.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 206% | −51.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.74 | 1.69 |
| Employees | 4,000 | 18K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 17.2× | – |
| P/S | 2.0× | 0.1× (better) |
| P/B | 4.5× | 0.8× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.7× | 7.6× (better) |
| P/FCF | 12.1× | – |
| PEG | 1.75 | – |
| FCF yield | 8.3% (better) | −2.2% |
| Fair value | $72.46 | $7.01 |
| Margin of safety | −49.1% | 31.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 37.6% | 41.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.7% (better) | 4.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −30.6% (better) | −487% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −28.6% (better) | −406% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 22.8% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 36.4% (better) | 10.9% |
| Operating margin | 19.6% (better) | 0.98% |
| Net margin | 12.0% (better) | −2.0% |
| FCF margin | 16.7% (better) | −0.30% |
| Return on equity | 28.3% (better) | −15.2% |
| Return on invested capital | 14.6% (better) | 1.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 2.08 (better) | 3.39 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.31 (better) | 5.96 |
| Interest coverage | – | 0.3× |
| Current ratio | 1.81 (better) | 1.40 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.79 (better) | 0.91 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.1% | – |
| Payout ratio | 17.8% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 | – |
| Buyback yield | 1.6% (better) | 0.73% |
| Shareholder yield | 2.6% (better) | 0.73% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 104% | 101% |
| Held by insiders | 0.76% | 4.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$6.0M | $182K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.8% | 8.2% |
Go deeper
- ALSN stock overview
- ALSN income statement
- ALSN valuation and score
- DCH stock overview
- DCH income statement
- DCH valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.