Allison Transmission vs Cooper-Standard
ALSN and CPS side by side, both in motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ALSN and CPS compare
Allison Transmission is the larger company, worth 25 times as much as Cooper-Standard ($8.9B against $357M).
Allison Transmission grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (37.6% versus 27.9% for Cooper-Standard).
Allison Transmission keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 12.0% compared with −1.7% at Cooper-Standard.
Allison Transmission pays a dividend yielding 1.1%; Cooper-Standard does not pay one.
Allison Transmission scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 5 for Cooper-Standard), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ALSN | CPS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $8.9B | $357M |
| Share price | $108.05 | $20.07 |
| Change, 1 year | 32.4% | −48.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 206% | −7.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.74 | 2.33 |
| Employees | 4,000 | 22K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 17.2× | – |
| P/S | 2.0× | 0.1× (better) |
| P/B | 4.5× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.7× | 13.5× (better) |
| P/FCF | 12.1× | – |
| PEG | 1.75 | – |
| FCF yield | 8.3% (better) | −7.9% |
| Fair value | $72.46 | – |
| Margin of safety | −49.1% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 37.6% (better) | 27.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.7% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −30.6% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −28.6% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 22.8% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 36.4% (better) | 12.0% |
| Operating margin | 19.6% (better) | 2.9% |
| Net margin | 12.0% (better) | −1.7% |
| FCF margin | 16.7% (better) | −0.81% |
| Return on equity | 28.3% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 14.6% (better) | 9.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 2.08 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.31 (better) | 10.06 |
| Current ratio | 1.81 (better) | 1.36 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.79 | 1.90 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.1% | – |
| Payout ratio | 17.8% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 | – |
| Buyback yield | 1.6% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 2.6% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 104% | 64.9% |
| Held by insiders | 0.76% | 5.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$6.0M | $295K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.8% | 4.1% |
Go deeper
- ALSN stock overview
- ALSN income statement
- ALSN valuation and score
- CPS stock overview
- CPS income statement
- CPS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.