Alarm.com vs N-able
ALRM and NABL side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ALRM and NABL compare
Alarm.com is the larger company, worth 3.6 times as much as N-able ($3.3B against $907M).
Alarm.com grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (9.3% versus 8.3% for N-able).
Alarm.com scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 8 for N-able), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ALRM | NABL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.3B | $907M |
| Share price | $66.42 | $4.80 |
| Change, 1 year | 31.3% | −39.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −20.1% | −59.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.89 | 0.74 |
| Employees | 2,058 | 1,852 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 29.9× | – |
| P/S | 3.0× | 1.7× (better) |
| P/B | 3.6× | 1.2× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.3× | 12.1× (better) |
| P/FCF | 17.0× | 12.0× (better) |
| PEG | 0.94 | – |
| FCF yield | 5.9% | 8.3% (better) |
| Fair value | $71.76 | $9.33 |
| Margin of safety | 7.4% | 48.6% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 9.3% (better) | 8.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.3% | 10.9% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −5.9% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 10.0% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 66.1% | 75.9% (better) |
| Operating margin | 13.2% (better) | 10.2% |
| Net margin | – | −2.3% |
| FCF margin | 17.7% (better) | 14.1% |
| Return on equity | – | −1.5% |
| Return on invested capital | 184% (better) | 2.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.51 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 3.01 |
| Interest coverage | 9.5× | – |
| Current ratio | 4.83 (better) | 1.11 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.46 (better) | 1.51 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 2.4% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 2.4% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 98.8% | 101% |
| Held by insiders | 6.0% | 62.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$7.7M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.5% | 5.3% |
Go deeper
- ALRM stock overview
- ALRM income statement
- ALRM valuation and score
- NABL stock overview
- NABL income statement
- NABL valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.