StockData

Alps vs Charming Medical

ALPS and MCTA side by side, both in health services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ALPS and MCTA compare

Alps grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (44.1% versus −22.7% for Charming Medical).

Charming Medical keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −0.47% compared with −41.4% at Alps.

Alps scores higher on the StockData Score (4 against 3 for Charming Medical), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricALPSMCTA
Size and price
Share price$1.18$29.35
Change, 1 year−71.2%33.3%
Beta (5Y)0.220.85
Employees8929
StockData Score
Total score4 (better)3
Valuation score00
Growth score1 (better)0
Performance score01 (better)
Health score3 (better)2
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)44.1% (better)−22.7%
Net income growth (TTM)–−102%
EPS growth (TTM)–−100%
Profitability
Gross margin32.1%99.3% (better)
Operating margin−41.8%−0.61% (better)
Net margin−41.4%−0.47% (better)
FCF margin−54.2%−32.4% (better)
Return on equity–−0.87%
Return on invested capital–−13.7%
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.04
Interest coverage−40.2×−1.9× (better)
Current ratio0.361.89 (better)
Piotroski F-score4 (better)2
Ownership
Held by institutions–0.24%
Held by insiders61.4%71.9%
Short interest, % of float–11.5%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.