StockData

Alps vs Agape ATP

ALPS and ATPC side by side, both in health services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How ALPS and ATPC compare

Alps grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (44.1% versus −20.3% for Agape ATP).

Alps keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −41.4% compared with −100% at Agape ATP.

Agape ATP scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 4 for Alps), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricALPSATPC
Size and price
Market cap–$1.4M
Share price$1.19$1.35
Change, 1 year89.7%−97.8%
Change, 5 years–−100.0%
Beta (5Y)0.240.41
Employees8918
StockData Score
Total score48 (better)
Valuation score01 (better)
Growth score11
Performance score01 (better)
Health score35 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–1.2×
P/B–0.1×
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)44.1% (better)−20.3%
Revenue growth, 5Y average–−0.28%
Profitability
Gross margin32.1%55.9% (better)
Operating margin−41.8% (better)−271%
Net margin−41.4% (better)−100%
FCF margin−54.2%–
Return on equity–−5.1%
Return on invested capital–−10.9%
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.00
Interest coverage−40.2×–
Current ratio0.368.45 (better)
Altman Z-score–0.29
Piotroski F-score45 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield–0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions–10.5%
Held by insiders61.4%0.00%
Short interest, % of float–0.19%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.