Aeluma vs MicroVision
ALMU and MVIS side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ALMU and MVIS compare
Aeluma is the larger company, worth 3.5 times as much as MicroVision ($126M against $35.8M).
MicroVision grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (90.9% versus −34.6% for Aeluma).
Aeluma keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −313% compared with −2231% at MicroVision.
Aeluma scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 6 for MicroVision), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ALMU | MVIS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $126M | $35.8M |
| Share price | $6.55 | $1.05 |
| Change, 1 year | −53.4% | −92.6% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −99.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.67 | 1.65 |
| Employees | 27 | 350 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 34.6× | 7.1× (better) |
| P/B | 2.3× | 1.6× (better) |
| FCF yield | −3.9% (better) | −187% |
| Fair value | – | $2.20 |
| Margin of safety | – | 52.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −34.6% | 90.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | −17.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 30.7% (better) | −276% |
| Operating margin | −279% (better) | −2195% |
| Net margin | −313% (better) | −2231% |
| FCF margin | −134% (better) | −1326% |
| Return on equity | −23.9% (better) | −198% |
| Return on invested capital | −453% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | −10.9× |
| Current ratio | 26.84 (better) | 0.80 |
| Altman Z-score | 19.55 (better) | −19.67 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | −60.0% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% (better) | −60.0% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 28.2% | 10.5% |
| Held by insiders | 10.1% | 10.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$15.7M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 23.3% | 20.5% |
Go deeper
- ALMU stock overview
- ALMU income statement
- ALMU valuation and score
- MVIS stock overview
- MVIS income statement
- MVIS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.