Almonty Industries vs Ivanhoe Electric
ALM and IE side by side, both in materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ALM and IE compare
Almonty Industries grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (12.8% versus −13.4% for Ivanhoe Electric).
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ALM | IE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $1.1B |
| Share price | $8.22 | $6.75 |
| Change, 1 year | 18.3% | −49.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 362% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.05 | 1.93 |
| Employees | – | 286 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | – | 338× |
| P/B | – | 2.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 74.4× |
| FCF yield | – | −10.9% |
| Fair value | – | $3.73 |
| Margin of safety | – | −80.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 12.8% (better) | −13.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 7.3% | 59.0% (better) |
| Operating margin | −111% | 286% (better) |
| Net margin | – | −1498% |
| FCF margin | – | −3693% |
| Return on equity | – | −12.3% |
| Return on invested capital | −13.0% | 2.8% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.45 | – |
| Interest coverage | −9.0× | 4.0× (better) |
| Current ratio | 3.89 | 4.37 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | – | 10.67 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | −15.3% |
| Shareholder yield | – | −15.3% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 47.0% | 74.3% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 19.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$4.3M |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 9.0% |
Go deeper
- ALM stock overview
- ALM income statement
- ALM valuation and score
- IE stock overview
- IE income statement
- IE valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.